Problem with faked-system-time option

Hauke Laging mailinglisten at
Wed Jun 15 17:39:47 CEST 2011

Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, 17:07:22 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:

> I think it is a mistake to make this particular notation, when signature
> type 0x40 already exists:
> ---------------
>    0x40: Timestamp signature.
>        This signature is only meaningful for the timestamp contained in
>        it.
> ---------------


Is it possible to create such signatures with GnuPG? How?


PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 555 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20110615/ceb3f7a3/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list