Problem with faked-system-time option

Jerome Baum jerome at
Thu Jun 16 03:45:45 CEST 2011

>> You'd agree that "ask Professor Lichty" doesn't count as a formal
>> proof (or even significant evidence), right?
> No.  It does, however, qualify as "here is where you need to look if you
> want to verify my claims," which is the best you can hope for on a
> mailing list.  I'm done with this thread: it seems to have devolved
> about as far as it can go.

That's okay, it was a fun excursion. I believe the part of the thread
discussing timestamp signatures is still on-going, with interesting

Jerome Baum
tel +49-1578-8434336
email jerome at
PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A
PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list