jerome at jeromebaum.com
Tue Mar 22 15:41:54 CET 2011
Grant Olson <kgo at grant-olson.net> writes:
> On 03/21/2011 12:24 PM, Jerome Baum wrote:
>> Yes, per above. But good idea to not use an anonymous group -- this way
>> I can say I was testing stuff.
> If you want to get really paranoid, post to http://www.pgpboard.com/ via
> a TOR connection. That makes it difficult to show the message even
> originated from you.
Couldn't I just post to a test group via tor? Posting to that board is
like signing a statement "yes I am guilty" (to some at least). As for
tor, I was thinking in terms of measuring some kind of correlation
between messages appearing on the board and my computer pulling more
power (think increased CPU, etc.) -- or something like that -- all not
proof, but given time to collect the data, you can probably get a "high
chance" reading. So I think there are so many channels where you can get
this information once you have a suspect, that it isn't worth trying to
hide "it's me who posted this", and instead just post lots of stuff.
PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A
PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 880 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gnupg-users