Jerome Baum jerome at
Tue Mar 22 15:41:54 CET 2011

Grant Olson <kgo at> writes:

> On 03/21/2011 12:24 PM, Jerome Baum wrote:
>> Yes, per above. But good idea to  not use an anonymous group -- this way
>> I can say I was testing stuff.
> If you want to get really paranoid, post to via
> a TOR connection.  That makes it difficult to show the message even
> originated from you.

Couldn't I just post to a test  group via tor?  Posting to that board is
like signing a  statement "yes I am guilty" (to some  at least).  As for
tor,  I was  thinking in  terms of  measuring some  kind  of correlation
between messages  appearing on  the board and  my computer  pulling more
power (think increased  CPU, etc.) -- or something like  that -- all not
proof, but given time to collect  the data, you can probably get a "high
chance" reading. So I think there are so many channels where you can get
this information once you have a  suspect, that it isn't worth trying to
hide "it's me who posted this", and instead just post lots of stuff.

PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A
PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 880 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20110322/cef7204a/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list