what are the sub keys

[Jerome Baum]

"Robert J. Hansen" <rjh at sixdemonbag.org> writes:

> And this is where I part ways with you.  There is no reason not to bump
> key length up to 4096.  There is also no reason not to use SHA512 with a
> DSA-1k key, for instance.  Sure, only 160 bits of SHA512 will be used, but
> that's not a reason not to use it.  It's not as if you're making the system
> weaker.

Correct me if I'm  wrong on this one, but it does  make your key weaker,
right?

-- 
PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A
PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 880 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20110322/2f93824c/attachment-0001.pgp>