jerome at jeromebaum.com
Wed Mar 23 20:47:51 CET 2011
"Robert J. Hansen" <rjh at sixdemonbag.org> writes:
> On 3/23/11 3:06 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>> My suspicion is that we never had anywhere near as much privacy as
>> many believe. A hundred years ago...
> I grew up in a small town of under 5,000, where the nearest city of more
> than 20,000 was an hour's drive away. Forget "a hundred years ago":
> having been back there recently for a funeral, I can tell you small
> towns are still that same way today.
> In a sense, I think this validates my thesis. In a small town the cost
> of sharing information about people within the town, to people within
> the town, is just about nil: you wind up having these conversations
> while you're at the service station filling up your tank, when you're in
> line at the grocery store, when you're ... etc. But having these same
> conversations with people outside the town involves effort, which in
> turn means that you can travel 100 miles and be reasonably confident
> nobody there has heard of you.
> I agree that the small-town phenomenon argues against the idea of an
> idyllic privacy past. I just think modern communications means the
> entire world is turning into a small-town phenomena.
Also consider there is a cost of storing the information. Say we brought
the cost of information sharing with anybody down to zero. You end up
with the phenomena we can observe with "activity streams" on Facebook
and Twitter -- people start filtering for what's interesting. There is
no way I will remember stuff about 7 billion people world-wide, but
people in my "small town" would be much more interesting.
PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A
PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 880 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gnupg-users