GPA File Manager
jerome at jeromebaum.com
Fri Nov 18 09:25:37 CET 2011
On 2011-11-17 22:39, Mark Kirchner wrote:
> Am 17.11.2011 21:31, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>> No: *you* would call them intolerant and freedom-of-choice-denying.
>> Please be careful about making universal statements about what the
>> world in general would say: the world generally does not conform to
>> our expectations.
> Yes, you're right, it is my personal opinion which could only backed by
> anecdotal evidence - if at all. Anyways, I'm still quite confident that
> quite a lot of people would feel that way.
For what it's worth, I don't feel that it would be "intolerant and
freedom-of-choice-denying" at all if Symantec were to say "in the PGP
forums you should not advocate other alternatives" because "the PGP
forums" are their turf. gnupg-users is GnuPG-the-project's turf so we
follow the rules GnuPG has chosen to adapt. It seems to work out well:
GnuPG-the-project doesn't bother Symantec, and Symantec doesn't bother
GnuPG. Everyone's happy!
PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A
PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA
A short strip of nonfunctioning material.
Of all the things the problem that wasn't his was,
being not his problem wasn't one of them.
No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 878 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Gnupg-users