Key revocation UI confusion

Michel Messerschmidt lists at
Sat Oct 15 21:00:07 CEST 2011

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:58:27AM +1100, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 16/10/11 2:15 AM, MFPA wrote:
> > 
> > The key revocation message saying "this key was revoked" suggests it
> > to be referring to the key that was just listed rather than the one
> > that is about to be listed. Maybe something like "the following key
> > was revoked" might be a better wording if the message appears before
> > the revoked key.
> That's a pretty good suggestion for a change, it would help to reduce
> ambiguity.

I would prefer "the following subkey was revoked"

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20111015/d5764ece/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list