Posting rules for the gnupg-devel@ mailing list
roam at ringlet.net
Tue Sep 20 22:04:53 CEST 2011
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 06:31:44PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
> Please Cc: me, I am not subscribed to the list.
> I found what I think is a bug in gpg-agent (the environment file should
> be delete when quitting), please see:
> Yesterday, after having patched gpg-agent and extensively tested my
> (very simple) patch, I sent it to the gnupg-devel@ mailing list, but I
> still fail to see it appearing on the archives:
> Subject: [PATCH] Remove the environment file when quitting.
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:33:13 +0200
> Message-Id: <1316457193-26043-1-git-send-email-luca at pca.it>
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 126.96.36.199
> While I know that my email was accepted, I have not received any
> error/moderation message:
> Sep 19 20:33:27 clio postfix/smtp: 5D125CE980: to=<gnupg-devel at gnupg.org>, \
> relay=ns1.u64.de[188.8.131.52]:25, delay=6.4, delays=0.01/0.01/6.2/0.12, \
> dsn=4.0.0, status=deferred (host ns1.u64.de[184.108.40.206] said: \
> 451-220.127.116.11 is not yet authorized to deliver mail from <luca at pca.it> \
> to 451 <gnupg-devel at gnupg.org>. Please try later. (in reply to RCPT TO command))
> Sep 19 20:42:49 [...] status=deferred [...]
> Sep 19 20:52:49 [...] status=deferred [...]
> Sep 19 21:12:49 [...] status=deferred [...]
> Sep 19 21:52:50 clio postfix/smtp: 5D125CE980: to=<gnupg-devel at gnupg.org>, \
> relay=ns1.u64.de[18.104.22.168]:25, delay=4769, delays=4763/0.01/5.1/0.81, \
> dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 OK id=1R5jta-0006Hh-CE)
> Should I subscribe to the gnupg-devel@ mailing list to post? Can this
> information be added to the listinfo page, please?
Not necessarily. I believe that this is just greylisting in action -
In short, if your mailserver is well-behaved and retransmits the message
within a reasonable timeframe (usually a couple of hours would be enough,
although most mailservers will retry in less than an hour), the gnupg.org
server will accept your message and everything will be just fine.
Of course, the gnupg.org mail admins are free to jump in and correct me :)
Peter Pentchev roam at ringlet.net roam at FreeBSD.org peter at packetscale.com
PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been paradoxical.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Gnupg-users