Creating a key bearing no user ID

[Robert J. Hansen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 1/23/12 6:23 PM, MFPA wrote:
> Suggestions like this tend to get lambasted because they do not 
> enhance security, and privacy appears to be seen as unimportant.

Not in the slightest.  The idea is certainly worthwhile.  It's just
that there's no implementation of it, nor even a solid idea of how to
implement it.  If we're going to play a game of "wouldn't it be nice
if," I'd like honest politicians, stronger beer, and lower taxes.

I am skeptical that such a thing can be done, and for that reason
elect to not spend time on it.  But please don't misrepresent my
position, or that of others who share my position, as believing that
"privacy is unimportant."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iFYEAREIAAYFAk8d+dkACgkQI4Br5da5jhDawgDfdL3cOL3u6zHr4plxfmkz+iRa
CJ1ATZTP48/uAQDdG9yBhRDtJg+5NLzT+rZ45bmovlO9AmrPlp1yhA==
=e6BB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----