non-interactive expiration of a key using --batch?

Werner Koch wk at
Mon May 7 10:26:56 CEST 2012

On Sat,  5 May 2012 00:38, dkg at said:

> Any ideas what's going on here?  Am i wrong to try to use --batch in
> this instance?

It would be useful to add --status-fd 2, so that you can see what gpg
actually expects as user/batch input.



Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list