Some people say longer keys are silly. I think they should be supported by gpg.

[Hauke Laging]

Am Di 22.05.2012, 14:46:03 schrieb Kevin Kammer:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 08:26:14PM +0200 Also sprach Hauke Laging:
> > Given the frequency of this discussion and the amount of effort takes by
> > the participants: Wouldn't it make sense to make this a FAQ entry?
> 
> Honestly now, do you think having a FAQ entry stops this topic
> resurrecting every few months?

No, but I don't see that as a problem. I think the question / proposal would 
come up at about the same frequency but would end in one reply pointing at the 
FAQ entry instead of now (do you want to count...?) emails.


Hauke
-- 
PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 555 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20120522/f12b9359/attachment.pgp>