Some people say longer keys are silly. I think they should be supported by gpg.

Faramir faramir.cl at gmail.com
Wed May 23 03:28:18 CEST 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

El 22-05-2012 12:33, Jerry escribió:
...
> that sort of logic. What really amazed me though was that the OP
> wants security and yet he uses GMail. "GMail" and "security" are 
> diametrically opposed concepts.

  Why? If I send an encrypted message, it doesn't matter if I use
gmail, ISP-expensive-crap-mail or any other provider, the message
would still be encrypted end-to-end. Of course I'm not talking about
composing a message in the webmail editor and then encrypting it, but
about using a MUA, like Thunderbird, or maybe composing the message on
a text editor, encrypting it and pasting it on the message body (or
attaching the encrypted text file).

  Best Regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPvD0yAAoJEMV4f6PvczxA0BAH/A2prkdtv6LcIC6U1PQcId3v
BBbeLL8VeqBZq+XDYqBM1GP56BLH1CFWOXaSrEiIhPsLtaF6TkJLHfA5GEbSwQ+j
RkyI5MN1M88ZyTlvbdvm0uSiLzFXEmp9Jtqlwr58C29oTvI1JFwD9SxVKXmOwnSP
GHRgG7HBwSiBDFbSnjALE9nW6cDD1J6LwJaGvkD4tmKkJLqPzimoBnJ+o8P3TbdB
/AnhGlwaxlQQd0+5cxCiGBZ1NfZAZGmMWqD/1IE3bZMIs3hp/JkA4MDUwP5E8z25
N/nQPgoNb9iaFy0yozycZLEq4qDBHQxvLQNK79tSBe5+B2QJmPEYglxzserNfXA=
=o2WG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list