getting an encrypted file to show what public key was used
Hauke Laging
mailinglisten at hauke-laging.de
Tue May 29 22:02:35 CEST 2012
Am Di 29.05.2012, 21:29:51 schrieb Werner Koch:
> I have said this at least a hundred times, but it is still not known
> well enough.
You probably mean: "Among the readers of this list." How much known may it be
in the wild...?
> Would an option --annotate which enables
> --with-colons, --batch, and --status-fd be helpful?
I don't think so because giving --with-colons, --batch, and --status-fd is not
the problem. Making this easier should not have a big effect on the problem.
The problem is knowledge (and discipline). So the aim should be to spread the
knowledge. This could be done by printing a warning to stderr when stdin and
stdout are not terminals and these options are not given:
"You are probably running gpg non-interactively. In order not to break scripts
it is strongly encouraged to use scripted output of gpg only with the options
--with-colons, --batch and --status-fd. See http://www.gnupg.org/..."
Hauke
--
PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 555 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20120529/8eec0013/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list