collision vs. preimage attacks: policy for signing data created by others
Hauke Laging
mailinglisten at hauke-laging.de
Fri Oct 5 01:10:23 CEST 2012
Am Do 04.10.2012, 10:51:57 schrieb spam man:
> So the question is...
>
> 1.) I have two different messages that have the same hash value (a
> collision).
> hash("foo") = abcdefg
> hash("bar") = abcdefg
>
> 2.) Now you want to append identical new data to the messages and see if
> the new hashes would still be collisions?
> hash("foo and here are some more words") = tuvwxyz
> hash("bar and here are some more words") = tuvwxyz
>
> Is this your question?
Yes.
--
☺
PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 555 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20121005/3338619d/attachment-0001.pgp>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list