collision vs. preimage attacks: policy for signing data created by others

Hauke Laging mailinglisten at hauke-laging.de
Fri Oct 5 01:10:23 CEST 2012


Am Do 04.10.2012, 10:51:57 schrieb spam man:
> So the question is...
> 
> 1.) I have two different messages that have the same hash value (a
> collision).
>            hash("foo") = abcdefg
>            hash("bar") = abcdefg
> 
> 2.) Now you want to append identical new data to the messages and see if
> the new hashes would still be collisions?
>           hash("foo and here are some more words") = tuvwxyz
>           hash("bar and here are some more words") = tuvwxyz
> 
> Is this your question?

Yes.
-- 
☺
PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 555 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20121005/3338619d/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list