Gnupg-users Digest, Vol 108, Issue 6

[Cyrus Jones]

thx

On 09/10/2012 10:21 AM, gnupg-users-request at gnupg.org wrote:
> Send Gnupg-users mailing list submissions to
> 	gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	gnupg-users-request at gnupg.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	gnupg-users-owner at gnupg.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gnupg-users digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: A safe text editor (No such Client)
>    2. Re: A safe text editor (Peter Lebbing)
>    3. Re: A safe text editor (Marco Steinacher)
>    4. Re: A safe text editor (antispam06 at sent.at)
>    5. Re: A safe text editor (Milo)
>    6. Re: gpgme passphrase_cb (problem solved) (John Morris)
>    7. Errormessage KGPG in Mint KDE 13 (Albrecht Will)
>    8. Re: Errormessage KGPG in Mint KDE 13 (Tobias Mueller)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 22:12:08 +0200
> From: No such Client <nosuchclient at gmail.com>
> To: gnupg users <gnupg-users at gnupg.org>
> Subject: Re: A safe text editor
> Message-ID: <504CF818.8030800 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> On 09/09/2012 10:04 PM, antispam06 at sent.at wrote:
>>
>> It's sad to see that Pretty Good Privacy is just about pretty good and
>> nothing more. People don't seem to care beyond playing 007. 
> Finally, *someone* gets it. You always have to push the bar of sec and
> crypto. Not wallow in routines and complacency.  That is how people get
> sloppy, and dogma sets in..
> 
>> In a way
>> it's dramatic given the Industriaised World is all about crunching data.
>> Jake Applebaum was right: people should read IBM and the Holocaust.
>>
>>
>>   
> 
> Or a modern-day equivalent, how western defence companies knowingly
> sell/give/transfer armanents to embargoed powers, (cough China, Iran,
> DPRK) either directly or indirectly against their own or friendly
> soldiers/civilians ?
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 195 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL: </pipermail/attachments/20120909/12269bef/attachment-0001.pgp>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 23:02:30 +0200
> From: Peter Lebbing <peter at digitalbrains.com>
> To: antispam06 at sent.at
> Cc: gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> Subject: Re: A safe text editor
> Message-ID: <504D03E6.5000903 at digitalbrains.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> On 09/09/12 22:04, antispam06 at sent.at wrote:
>> It's sad to see that Pretty Good Privacy is just about pretty good and
>> nothing more. People don't seem to care beyond playing 007.
> 
> Are you talking about how an encryption/signing tool is not a text editor??
> What's with the sudden demeaning criticism?
> 
> Peter.
> 
> PS: I must say I'm a bit surprised nobody here seems to know any good
> secret-text-editors. I just fail to see how this is a failure of OpenPGP or
> GnuPG. Or the people here.
> 

-- 
Cyrus G. Jones                      <jones at atmo.arizona.edu>
Institute of Atmospheric Physics    <cyrus at dakotacom.net>
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona  85721              (520) 444-7662