FAQ? Re: please give us safer defaults for gnupg

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Wed Dec 18 16:09:26 CET 2013

Am Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 20:42:54 schrieb Werner Koch:
> May I suggest to read the archives of just a few weeks to collect the
> reasons why suggestions of using SHA-512 are missing the point.  Some
> folks here must have bleeding fingertips from repeating the arguments
> over and over.

What about placing this as an FAQ in the wiki.gnupg.org?
I believe we can then refine the argument, so it can be understood more 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20131218/5f3d61bf/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list