More secure than smartcard or cryptostick against remote attacks?

refreshing at refreshing at
Thu Feb 7 10:58:14 CET 2013

> On 06/02/13 11:37, Hauke Laging wrote:
> The
> device proposed by OP/by me seeks security in being restricted and simple.
> And
> also takes a whole lot less of effort to use ;).


> But let's stick to the e-mail signing in this thread, or the discussion
> will get
> very unfocused and hard to follow. If you want to continue anyway, could
> you
> please change the Subject: line?


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list