"New" packet headers and gpg
Stephen Paul Weber
singpolyma at singpolyma.net
Fri Jan 4 15:39:22 CET 2013
Somebody claiming to be David Shaw wrote:
>On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma at singpolyma.net> wrote:
>> tell gpg or gpg2 to produce "new" packet length headers for output?
>
>No. GPG automatically uses the old packet headers for those packets that
>can be described that way
Hmm, ok. I was hoping that with all the "advanced mode, you probably don't
care about this" features, there would be one for this.
--
Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma
See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted
edition right joseph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20130104/3125e0ef/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list