"New" packet headers and gpg

Stephen Paul Weber singpolyma at singpolyma.net
Fri Jan 4 15:39:22 CET 2013

Somebody claiming to be David Shaw wrote:
>On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma at singpolyma.net> wrote:
>> tell gpg or gpg2 to produce "new" packet length headers for output?  
>No.  GPG automatically uses the old packet headers for those packets that 
>can be described that way

Hmm, ok.  I was hoping that with all the "advanced mode, you probably don't 
care about this" features, there would be one for this.

Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma
See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted
edition right joseph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20130104/3125e0ef/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list