GPG weakness

Robert Holtzman holtzm at
Fri Jul 26 08:24:08 CEST 2013

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:59:17PM +0200, Manu García wrote:

> I always thought that GnuPG was rather secure, but it seems that among
> experts it's a well known weak and poor ciphering technology which no
> security experts consider seriously. At least that's the impression I get
> reading said article.

I saw nothing in the article to support this paragraph. You're drawing
conclusions out of thin air. 

Bob Holtzman
Your mail is being read by tight lipped 
Homeland Security agents who fail to see
the humor in Doctor Strangelove 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20130725/72d19536/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list