trust your corporation for keyowner identification?

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Monday 28 October 2013 at 8:51:30 AM, in
<mid:526e2592.vizyzHwEGhmqqHhK%sttob at privatdemail.net>, Stan Tobias
wrote:


> I say it does not, because basing one's certification
> on that of the notary is not [the same as] basing one's
> certification on the notary's verification efforts.

What evidence of the Notary's verification efforts do you review? From
my reading of this thread, there is only the _assumption_ that
sufficient identity checks were properly carried out before the
individual started working in a role that carried a corporate email
address.


- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:expires2013 at ymail.com

Beware the deadly donkey falling slowly from the sky
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iPQEAQEKAF4FAlJzx6xXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0
N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pNUIEAMUYiECVOqbZkNqNvc7ql6Dqr0rELL7wSPuV
pyeKoV7DVmQwZJBcAfCXOS9JFh1vf9f+ziX+1UjmPWezdyF2Rm5tH3hDnhx3wC4V
ieGqimLOP5BllF/E/Yy5XQrw6wwqZzgTQ+tRfXGKc3qJMCd4KUNmkf8uRqa7Bzp/
57Ih7mWL
=s1Md
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----