2048 or 4096 for new keys? aka defaults vs. Debian
johanw at vulcan.xs4all.nl
Sun Oct 27 19:39:04 CET 2013
On 27-10-2013 18:36, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Consumer-grade hardware is a decadent Garden of Eden. However, the tiny
> little processor that monitors chemical levels at your local water
> treatment plant is going to be embarrassingly low-powered.
That's fine, but I doubt I'll ever email such a system. Keys used for
such systems, e.g. to sign firmware updates, will be created
specifically for that purpose and their parameters can be chosen to work
with such systems. I don't need to care wether my email key would work
fluently on such a system or not. Cryptocards will probably aso have
little processing capacity but they are usually not used for bulk
> The world of computer security is a lot larger than Bruce Schneier.
Of course, but he is someone who vents his opinions for a large public.
The non-crypto expert will probably not read (and understand) the
research papers from Adi Shamir.
But it's always nice to understand why certain things are advised.
Accepting authority blindly is bad security practice.
ir. J.C.A. Wevers
PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html
More information about the Gnupg-users