The symmetric ciphers

Philipp Klaus Krause pkk at spth.de
Wed Oct 30 18:06:11 CET 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 10.09.2013 13:45, schrieb Werner Koch:
> You would also need a second public keypair to protect the second 
> symmetric key.  If you don't, the attacker would target the public
> key scheme directly - ah well that is in any case the lower hanging
> fruit.

I wouldn't assme that: RSA is something taught in typical maths and
computer science curriculums at universities. Factorization is a
well-known problem.
Symmetric ciphers, on the other hand are for specialists.
So I would assume that RSA got much more attention and eyes looking at
it than any symmetric cipher.

Philipp

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJxPIAACgkQbtUV+xsoLpqAAACg9OF7Wa+MsoIbyEpcEqruFpgT
rkUAniJ6U2sZExDoo/iFa4A1W4XXobaw
=wl/M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list