UI terminology for calculated validities
2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Sat Apr 26 14:43:32 CEST 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
On Friday 25 April 2014 at 3:49:30 AM, in
<mid:1691426.OzBBnA61Yg at inno>, Hauke Laging wrote:
> Thus I would like to offer "accepted" as a possible
> alternative. I guess that shows the user decision.
> Maybe even as a combination: "authenticity accepted".
In the case of a non-exportable signature made simply to allow me to
encrypt to a key, I am not "accepting" or "authenticating" or
"validating" or "verifying" that key. All I am doing is "activating"
it for use.
MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Greater than being great is being grateful.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users