UI terminology for calculated validities

MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Sat Apr 26 14:43:32 CEST 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

Hi


On Friday 25 April 2014 at 3:49:30 AM, in
<mid:1691426.OzBBnA61Yg at inno>, Hauke Laging wrote:


> Thus I would like to offer "accepted" as a possible
> alternative. I guess that shows the user decision.
> Maybe even as a combination: "authenticity accepted".

In the case of a non-exportable signature made simply to allow me to
encrypt to a key, I am not "accepting" or "authenticating" or
"validating" or "verifying" that key. All I am doing is "activating"
it for use.

--
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

Greater than being great is being grateful.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iPQEAQEKAF4FAlNbqflXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0
N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pY4QD/3OOZN2e5POCEdnWYMPSaXEBbzJf3ITEvr/v
8mVloI6caUoVdsTmg/nqi0HYNX0SDN0Z9/5w9Dqchaj0oxbVSJbKUMt0mMOVyRRZ
e7U4buLTfbei4hTZODWQn4GghT+KrmSTIopQE+Gz4ENf17hhK2ODzOpjyygf4EjQ
7QAebfSM
=Aayn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list