Setpref is not working or is it a bug or something?

MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Mon Dec 1 23:30:43 CET 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Monday 1 December 2014 at 10:33:49 AM, in
<mid:002001d00d52$4b7ac200$e2704600$@on.yourweb.de>, gnupgpack wrote:


> Hello,

>> I suggest that you stop deleting the In-reply-to and
>> the References header.

> Ok, i'll give it a try ;)

There, that worked. (-:



> Some of the cleaned header entries are non-standard
> additions [1], for example issued by M$, useless for
> non-M$ clients... For example Priority is set by
> X-PRIORITY (RFC2076) and Importance (RFC1327/1911).

All X-headers are non-standard, but not necessarily useless to other
mail clients. My experience is that emails marked as high-priority in
Outlook tend to show as such in non-MS clients, and vice versa.



- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

People who throw kisses are hopelessly lazy.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iPQEAQEKAF4FAlR87CVXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0
N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5p9PUD/iktLj7gtPwqFJ4lRgneoUsn8lAJMMAr4BIC
1DO1zYh0XXj5pzsMWdyxQwlH236xcBopO9mUuDV1K5TTfOqc9tyTdYZwDJedrbAd
gza5rbD7+INY4t2h5ohFDmh8+fvYPx4cth3JaRn4/qxBh9uZmfVVW8ceEdPAO3R5
ROf7CxVhiQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUfOwlXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRp
b25zLm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZB
NUEwRjU2QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXw8hwIAKhsp4mRO67+Um0x
m3YCDKkaNHVGyWyVQKoivi1asx+SW91/4FgrWZAvtmib3N0lkrRk2M4V8wXZ+2CM
h8wVZ/MMMLwHE9WpuD7JvKYRxwAe3U28b1SsjkjJB0qsz9wU95jWHyY7isqBPW7J
3scCPEsfwxp8IblT8Rj1zbTevUqSmRUEfPheaNBTiSWyVsNEtfHqZLcV4j8qZlri
07jVns2Y2Le73gSazDJ8O/DJMIqR02/1TTJ3siH3Q9NitYIOjEEJTPtJSiNFYhko
uxkAgi3RiE0+CDkqKPoTaD26YiWU57+ysykLzLKBIuaiYdBXXvmHunGndoxtrIXL
L1wN/SA=
=/7vi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list