Security patches and gpg 1/2 development

[Tristan Santore]

On 02/12/14 17:03, Brian Minton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> <dkg at fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
>
>>  https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/index
>>
> I noticed that my browser complained about the certificate of that
> URL.  Is that the correct address?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
SHA256 Finger Print:
A4:00:9A:76:1E:DA:98:12:36:E8:2F:89:CF:28:8C:E7:A1:BB:17:93:3D:C0:68:D1:A9:82:60:A6:0C:73:2B:39

That is what I have here. I had to add an exemption on this as it is not
signed by a CA. But then again, just because it is signed by a CA, does
not necessarily make it safer.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Tristan

-- 

Tristan Santore BSc MBCS
TS4523-RIPE
Network and Infrastructure Operations
InterNexusConnect
Mobile +44-78-55069812
Tristan.Santore at internexusconnect.net

Former Thawte Notary
(Please note: Thawte has closed its WoT programme down,
and I am therefore no longer able to accredit trust)

For Fedora related issues, please email me at:
TSantore at fedoraproject.org