"key algorithm" in GnuPG's signature verification output
MFPA
2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Wed Dec 10 03:52:44 CET 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Tuesday 9 December 2014 at 10:58:47 AM, in
<mid:001101d0139f$1b426bd0$51c74370$@on.yourweb.de>, gnupgpacker
wrote:
> Gpg-1.4.8 isn't captable using edDAS. In my opinion
> output would be ok if a new edDSA key has been used!?
> If RSA signing key has been used, there might be some
> fault...
Both were used.
For the RSA subkey, the verification output you shared shows bad signature.
For the EDDSA subkey your output is the expected result.
- --
Best regards
MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
The trouble with words is that you never know whose mouths they've been in.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=
=nRKO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list