Mainkey with many subkeys??

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



On Saturday 13 December 2014 at 2:22:17 PM, in
<mid:548C4B99.6030505 at sumptuouscapital.com>, Kristian Fiskerstrand
wrote:


> But you could always generate a new self-signature
> giving it signing capability.

As you said in an earlier posting, that requires the use of a hacked
GnuPG version. Which would tend to limit how many people are capable
or willing.



> But anyhow, that is a
> digression, the point remains that a spare S capability
> does no harm to the security of the key.

I think that's true.


- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

People who throw kisses are hopelessly lazy.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=
=zzh7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----