Moving away from SHA-1

[Kristian Fiskerstrand]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi Per,

On 02/12/2014 09:31 AM, Per Tunedal wrote:
> Hi Peter, Yes, I've searched the archives. Conclusion: There's not
> any immediate danger to GnuPG.
> 
> But, all the same: I cannot find any information on what's the
> plans for the future. Sooner or later a transition to some other
> hash has to take place, hasn't it?

The appropriate place for such a change would be new defaults in the
standards, i.e. that this likely would be part of a future V5 OpenPGP
key format. The appropriate ML for that would be [0]

References:
[0] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/current/maillist.html


- -- 
- ----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
- ----------------------------
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
- ----------------------------
Aut disce aut discede
Either learn or leave
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=FBe2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----