GPG's vulnerability to quantum cryptography

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Sunday 6 July 2014 at 8:36:05 AM, in
<mid:20140706073605.GA65057 at blinkenshell.org>, The Fuzzy Whirlpool
Thunderstorm wrote:


> Using GPG encryption is still good, although it's
> vulnerable to quantum cryptodecryption. It's a good
> idea to set an expiration for each of your GPG key. So
> that, when the expiration time comes, you'll be able to
> generate a new GPG key to address a possibility of your
> old keys being cracked.

At the same time, would you advocate decrypting all your encrypted
files and encrypting them to the new key? Or were you just referring
to encrypted communications?

- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

It is not necessary to have enemies if you go out of your way to make friends hate you.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iPQEAQEKAF4FAlO5OL1XFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0
N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pOaYEAMPOGTFQO+0oSNtJETxH3OxzwpcxRYJgurGN
nGVq70eSGo6HK+SH/J95rsI1g40UinTkp76n9U4EQpaHctW8NlnlS2z3ISueud2y
iz7KlVsMEd8VMAumKLtV2iYyFC1m/8KumWrhpmFT6Q61hFwdBFUzuTwFpE5OiuH6
MatrcVzo
=avfT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----