GPG's vulnerability to quantum cryptography

MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Mon Jul 7 01:40:13 CEST 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Sunday 6 July 2014 at 3:25:57 PM, in
<mid:53B95C75.5030209 at vulcan.xs4all.nl>, Johan Wevers wrote:



> Since I don't know when I will consider a key
> compromised or weak, I don't work with expiry dates but
> revoke the key in such a case.

I don't know quite what /The Fuzzy Whirlpool Thunderstorm/ had in
mind, but I would say setting expiry dates can maybe act as a reminder
to consider such matters from time to time. Of course, it could just
come around when you are too busy to consider any such thing, so you
blindly extend the expiry date anyway. Or you set them too short, so
extending becomes run-of-the-mill.



- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

Don't ask me, I'm making this up as I go!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iPQEAQEKAF4FAlO53mNXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0
N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pQIAEAISmyU2jyp8tYBRwqq1U1PTUtgdoyFVsh0mn
CvnyvbKtAT45swzyZwqcPihxus5vYXHZGBGYXc+3jFW1KIJiLICfUJqyEHnwBUeR
jTxtDc7+zXJayfG4cldoVJMtFn1EKuwI1LxRMUKPEFOQ2gxaBWddCyzcWeXvtPcK
/8OiJ9bW
=nTSB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list