GPG's vulnerability to quantum cryptography
2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Mon Jul 7 01:40:13 CEST 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sunday 6 July 2014 at 3:25:57 PM, in
<mid:53B95C75.5030209 at vulcan.xs4all.nl>, Johan Wevers wrote:
> Since I don't know when I will consider a key
> compromised or weak, I don't work with expiry dates but
> revoke the key in such a case.
I don't know quite what /The Fuzzy Whirlpool Thunderstorm/ had in
mind, but I would say setting expiry dates can maybe act as a reminder
to consider such matters from time to time. Of course, it could just
come around when you are too busy to consider any such thing, so you
blindly extend the expiry date anyway. Or you set them too short, so
extending becomes run-of-the-mill.
MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Don't ask me, I'm making this up as I go!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users