riseup.net OpenPGP Best Practices article
Nex6|Bill
n6ghost at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 24 20:35:25 CEST 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 6/24/2014 10:57 AM, Hauke Laging wrote:
> Am Di 24.06.2014, 09:50:04 schrieb Nex6|Bill:
>
>> anykind of "best practice", should be simple, so that it
>> encourages a sane baseline for people.
>
> That depends on it whether you need security or the illusion of
> security is enough for you.
>
> IMHO it is one of the main problems that hardly anyone cares about
> telling protection levels apart. "Security" is a really wide
> spectrum, for some beginning at "random six letter passwords". You
> cannot say in a useful sense what is a good recommendation without
> looking at what is needed in the respective situation.
>
>
> Thus I advocate a standardized set of security levels for data,
> keys and systems. And authentication on the other hand:
>
> http://www.crypto-fuer-alle.de/wishlist/securitylevel/ (German
> only)
>
>
> Hauke
>
how did you get, security vs illusionary security from that? and while
I agree that "security" is not well defined, in a way that a user or
admin can tell what level of security an object or configuration will
give him.
that does not mean we should get all hyper paranoid on all of our best
practices and guidelines to a point where only advanced geeks can
understand it.
for things, like encryption we, should make an effort for the
baselines to be sane, and simple. leave the more advanced stuff to the
advanced users. I have found that, when something is complex and or
hard to use
users will not use it, or will find ways around it.
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing
> list Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=JUaP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list