On the advisability of stronger digests than SHA-1 in OpenPGP certifications [was: Re: riseup.net OpenPGP Best Practices article]

MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Fri Jun 27 21:08:40 CEST 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Friday 27 June 2014 at 3:57:25 PM, in
<mid:53AD8655.4090603 at sumptuouscapital.com>, Kristian Fiskerstrand
wrote:



> You won't convince a corporate IT department in a Law
> firm (or for that matter Financial world) about it.
> They want SLAs and support, and who knows what custom
> addons they have for their Outlook setup for various
> functions that makes it impractical to switch to
> Thunderbird (does it support Exchange these days?)

I'm sure somebody is more than willing to sell them these things.



- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

Ultimate consistency lies in being consistently inconsistent
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iPQEAQEKAF4FAlOtwUlXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0
N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pIv8EAJJHPI9KCl2/qnHnMvsUq3FXEqfQXoFUlcSm
M9bZh1OApER1c5Lz6SPKk6nX9XitmYRPckJF6Z3QZ/708vh3p5yKjs12a4VEF13D
+2Hmx1DzF7odyc1s2/VKrneyEpMnkg1wz1aezFmToepyLvDVvjb0p9DrwupxYKgg
tqe1iYfz
=I+/f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list