GnuPG 2.1 and Mailpile (LWN comments) about GPGME
bernhard at intevation.de
Thu Nov 13 14:54:46 CET 2014
On Thursday 13 November 2014 at 11:54:57, Werner Koch wrote:
> A good step forwad would be the integration of lnaguage bindings into
> the gpgme package. That should make it easier to use it from languages
> other than C, C++ (, and CL).
Because of possible dependencies, they should end up in different Debian
packages. You are talking the source package I guess?
http://wiki.gnupg.org/APIs starts to have an overview about language bindings,
help appreciated to complete and maintain the list and possible links
> However, someone needs to feel reponsible
> for such a language binding and try to keep it up to date.
Pyme has a debian package. pygpgme has an Ubuntu package.
And there are more.
Mostly we need more packagers. :)
www.intevation.de/~bernhard (CEO) www.fsfe.org (Founding GA Member)
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Owned and run by Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Gnupg-users