Encryption on Mailing lists sensless?
Robert J. Hansen
rjh at sixdemonbag.org
Wed Nov 19 01:31:55 CET 2014
> It’s completely true. However Mark’s right when saying it could help
> to do it client-side...
No. Client-side, you get to inspect (fully) only your data, and you
have to develop a statistical model of spam based on only your data.
When Gmail filters, it inspects (fully) traffic to *millions* of users,
and uses that to create a model no individual user can hope to match.
Encrypting everything, even Aunt Edna's recipe for potato salad, means a
significant step backwards in the spam fight. I love decentralized
algorithms, but there's something to be said for a God's-eye perspective
on the problem -- look at decentralized route discovery protocols versus
Dijkstra's algorithm as an example.
> But the true solution is this one: use only free software, software
> you’re sure you can check the sources.
Maybe one user in ten thousand has the skill to audit a nontrivial
codebase. Free software is a good idea, but let's not pretend that
normal users will realize a real benefit from being able to check their
More information about the Gnupg-users