Encryption on Mailing lists sensless?

[MichaelQuigley at TheWay.Org]

MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net> wrote on 11/22/2014 
04:16:38 PM:

> From: MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net>
> To: "MichaelQuigley at TheWay.Org on GnuPG-Users" <gnupg-users at gnupg.org>
> Cc: "MichaelQuigley at TheWay.Org" <MichaelQuigley at TheWay.Org>
> Date: 11/22/2014 04:16 PM
> Subject: Re: Encryption on Mailing lists sensless?
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> Hi
> 
> 
> On Wednesday 19 November 2014 at 7:50:32 PM, in
> 
<mid:OFBE3B7F0E.C137FE74-ON85257D95.006C7C99-85257D95.006CFF33 at TheWay.org>,
> MichaelQuigley at TheWay.Org wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Which of course would not be possible if the public
> > mailing list was all encrypted.
> 
> Unless the search engine subscribed to the encrypted list and produced
> search results in the clear.
> 
> - --
> Best regards

And I'm not sure what we would be doing there except burning extra CPU 
cycles encrypting everything that's now publically available because the 
search engine has it all decrypted.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20141124/35fffe4c/attachment.html>