Pros and cons of PGP/MIME for outgoing e-mail?
Bjarni Runar Einarsson
bre at pagekite.net
Wed Nov 26 12:58:03 CET 2014
Hi all,
Thanks for all the feedback. My take-aways so far are:
1. People like PGP/MIME, there's zero interest here in replacing it
2. I need to spec out more clearly how the Manifest works
- the questions/concerns show I have not communicated my ideas clearly enough
My next steps on this will probably be:
1. Spec out the Manifest properly
2. Draft an implementation where the Manifest is used alongside PGP/MIME
(not instead of)
- think of it as an additional signature which also covers parts of the RFC822 header. ;-)
3. Come back here when I have something more concrete
In case folks were wondering, Mailpile currently defaults to PGP/MIME
when messages have attachments, but uses inline signatures/encryption
when there is only a text message to send. This is done to improve
compatibility with lame MUAs/plugins. It's configurable, but the setting
is not exposed in the default user interface at the moment.
The Manifest probably won't change that in the near future, unless I get
some solid data to back up the concerns I've outlined in the post and
here.
Cheers, and thanks for GnuPG!
- Bjarni
--
I make stuff: www.mailpile.is, www.pagekite.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP Digital Signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20141126/1624212e/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list