Wind river

[Julian H. Stacey]

"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
...
> All this being said, the laws aren't *wholly* stupid.  ITAR has a couple
> of nice commonsense exceptions.  (See, e.g., ITAR 120.10 (5): ITAR "does
> not include information concerning general scientific, mathematical, or
> engineering principles commonly taught in schools, colleges, and
> universities or information in the public domain.")

FYI:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Traffic_in_Arms_Regulations
USA national regs.

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=f8a7e639bbbcdd460e881f7ae4a927b3&node=pt22.1.120&rgn=div5#se22.1.120_110

Has 120.10 a & b but no 5.

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=f8a7e639bbbcdd460e881f7ae4a927b3&node=20140513y1.10
"e-CFR Data is current as of October 20, 2014"
"or information in the public domain as defined in \xa7120.11 of this subchapter"


PS
> Wait, you mean like the U.K. did after WW2 when it sold Enigma machines

Fascinating (well, I'm British :-) 

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com
 Indent previous with "> ".  Interleave reply paragraphs like a play script.
 Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative.