key length/size RSA discussion/recommendations in the wiki
vedaal at nym.hush.com
vedaal at nym.hush.com
Wed Oct 29 21:49:07 CET 2014
On 10/29/2014 at 3:22 PM, "Robert J. Hansen" <rjh at sixdemonbag.org> wrote:
>
>> Why is brute force even mentioned in something about RSA? You
>> couldn't brute-force a 128 bit RSA key. I'd say 2048 bit quite
>> covers it 8-)
-----
Surely Peter knows this too ;-)
More likely 128 was a typo for the more common older RSA key of 1028 ...
vedaal
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list