[Announce] GnuPG 2.1.7 released

[Michael Felt]

gpg4win - thinking slowly - does this mean there is a skeleton, or better
project, to minimize what is needed from gnome to run the "modern" versions
of gnupg.

I do not want to install much - actually nothing - of a X11 "server"
environment on AIX. I prefer to work with X things as applications my
DISPLAY "forwarded" over an ssh tunnel to my remote system.

So, maybe I would be happy with something like this for AIX - better is
that you reply - not needed with X server at remote side.

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 07:35, dongsheng.song at gmail.com said:
> >
> >> Any news on pinentry ? pinentry-0.9.4 (pinentry-w32.exe) works good on
> >> windows, but both pinentry-0.9.5 and pinentry-0.9.5-13-g1532bf3 broken
> >> on 32bit or 64 bit Windows.
> >
> > Right, I only noticed while testing the installer and had to go back to
> > 0.9.4 for the released installer.  The native windows installer did not
> > change and thus there is no real drawback using 0.9.4.  You are anyway
> > better off using a Qt or Gtk+ based Pinentry as delivered with Gpg4win -
> > GnuPG 2.1.7 will prefer a Pinentry installed by Gpg4win
> >
>
> Thanks, I like gpg4win-vanilla, because Qt or Gtk+ is too fat for me.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20150814/5a6a1e37/attachment.html>