protecting pub-keys from unwanted signatures

[Robert J. Hansen]

> I'll reiterate that there's really no such thing as unwanted
> signatures.

No?  So you'd be fine if someone generated a fake certificate belonging
to "White Power Action Network <wpan at stormfront.org>" and added a
signature to your certificate from it?

There are definitely such things as unwanted signatures.

> The more signatures on a key,  the stronger the Web of Trust. End of 
> story.

No.  This isn't even in the same postal code as reality.  More
signatures from *real people* may result in a better WoT; more
signatures, period, or signatures from fake identities, really don't add
anything.