MIME or inline signature ?

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Friday 13 February 2015 at 10:19:06 AM, in
<mid:54DDCF9A.5070104 at vulcan.xs4all.nl>, Johan Wevers wrote:


> On 13-02-2015 1:44, Jerry wrote:

>> Inline  totally destroys a "sig delimiter"

In an OpenPGP-aware mail client, that is the decision of the
developer. For example, is there any huge reason why it would be a bad
idea to treat <dash><space><dash><dash><newline> the same as they
treat <dash><dash><space><newline>?



> It is supposed to sign and/or encrypt the sig too.

>> and adds a lot of useless garbage to the message body.

> You need a mailclient to interpret that. Mail clients
> interprete Mime attachments too (or not).

In my opinion, one of the strengths of Inline is that you _don't_ need
a mail client to interpret it: the message can be pasted into a text
file or a command window.




- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

Maybe YOU have nothing to hide;
 that still leaves plenty you want to hide from!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=
=2SaR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----