MIME or inline signature ?

Hauke Laging mailinglisten at hauke-laging.de
Sun Feb 15 17:04:28 CET 2015

Am So 15.02.2015, 16:12:01 schrieb Stephan Beck:

> X-GPG-Key-ID: 0xBA4909B78F04DE1B
> X-GPG-Key:
> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/pks/lookup?search=0xBA4909B78F04DE1B&op=index
> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 9983 DCA1 1FAC 8DA7 653A  F9AA BA49 09B7 8F04 DE1B
> Obviously, it indicates a key ID 0xBA4909B78F04DE1B and links to a key
> that is not the key the message was signed with (which is
> DE2FFC869AFA5165, according to Enigmail/gpg)

0xDE2FFC869AFA5165 is a subkey of 0xBA4909B78F04DE1B. Of course, when 
pointing at a certificate you address it by its mainkey.

> It is not possible to verify the key DE2FFC869AFA5165 with the
> information given.

That is wrong.

Crypto für alle: http://www.openpgp-schulungen.de/fuer/unterstuetzer/
OpenPGP: 7D82 FB9F D25A 2CE4 5241 6C37 BF4B 8EEF 1A57 1DF5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 603 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20150215/e67e8534/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list