2.1.2: keyserver route failure

Ville Määttä mailing-lists at asatiifm.net
Wed Feb 18 23:00:29 CET 2015

> On 18 Feb 2015, at 21:13, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg at fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> I'm not convinced that it's gnupg's job to compensate for
> unreasonably-configured IPv6 stacks that think they have a route but
> actually don’t.

I agree. I think the actual problem should be addressed at the networking level instead of adding logic to GnuPG.


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list