2.1.2: keyserver route failure

[Ville Määttä]

> On 18 Feb 2015, at 21:13, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg at fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> 
> I'm not convinced that it's gnupg's job to compensate for
> unreasonably-configured IPv6 stacks that think they have a route but
> actually don’t.

I agree. I think the actual problem should be addressed at the networking level instead of adding logic to GnuPG.

-- 
Ville