Question about FAQ maintenance
Bernhard Reiter
bernhard at intevation.de
Fri Jul 3 11:01:59 CEST 2015
Hi Robert,
again thanks for maintaining the GnuPG FAQ, I believe it is really important
to have good quality source for frequently needed answers!
Some suggestions:
https://gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html says
| When was this FAQ last checked for accuracy?
| October 2012.
Is this still true? My suggestion would to add some date indication
so that readers can assume which version of the FAQ they are looking at.
(Background: I've seen some posts on the lists for new FAQ entries from 2014
and also I found a potential source code at
https://github.com/rjhansen/gpgfaq/blob/master/gpgfaq.xml with the last
commit in 2013 .. this confused me. ;) )
My suggestion is also to state how someone can best help with the FAQ
(or potentially where the master source lives. I know that we probably should
not adversise the proprietary services of github, I would welcome to have the
source elsewhere. But it is more important to see the latest revision before
reporting something.)
Best,
Bernhard
--
www.intevation.de/~bernhard (CEO) www.fsfe.org (Founding GA Member)
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Owned and run by Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20150703/b69b97c6/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list