Multiple Smartcards - Signing

Matthew Monaco matt at
Sun May 3 21:21:48 CEST 2015

On 05/03/2015 01:16 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sun 2015-05-03 06:35:37 -0400, MFPA wrote:
>> On Saturday 2 May 2015 at 3:36:47 AM, in <mid:87vbgb7lj4.fsf at>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Do you think a notification should be displayed, something like
>> "Signing subkey 0x01234567 not available. Creating signature using key
>> 0x89abcdef instead"?
> I don't have much of a preference.  Such a message should probably
> appear if the user has asked for --debug-level basic at least, though.
>        --dkg

I agree with a debug message. But in general I don't think a notification is so
important because the selection algorithm is arbitrary anyway. E.g., why not
strongest rather than newest?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20150503/f91f9a4d/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list