Attacks on encrypted communicxatiopn rising in Europe

[Wolf]

On , Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> 3.  If no, then how should we permit privacy tools to be
>     circumvented?

Do you honestly believe that this is really possible? That government
backdoor will stay available only to government and will not be
misused?

As an example I would raise issue of TSA accepted luggage locks. You
know, those locks that only TSA is supposed to have master key to
inspect for threats? The master key you can download from internet and
print on your 3d printed and open any TSA accepted lock with
it?

( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transportation_Security_Administration#Luggage_locks )

So in my eyes, when it comes to your question, we have only two
options, no privacy or absolute privacy. Or do you know of any way to
guarantee that government backdoor will not be made public and/or
misused?

Tomas Volf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20160824/2f166a89/attachment.sig>