GnuPG and the debian-archive-keyring

stebe at mailbox.org stebe at mailbox.org
Mon Feb 1 00:06:54 CET 2016


Hi,

> Andrew Gallagher <andrewg at andrewg.com> hat am 31. Januar 2016 um 18:40
> geschrieben:
> 
> 
> On 31 Jan 2016, at 15:07, stebe at mailbox.org wrote:
> > 
> > gpg2 --edit-key 0x2B90D010
> > 
> > Dieser Schlüssel könnte durch RSA mit Schlüssel CA1CF964 [?]
> >  widerrufen
> > worden sein
> > [This key may have been revoked by RSA key CA1CF964 [?]]
> > Dieser Schlüssel könnte durch RSA mit Schlüssel B12525C4 [?]
> >  widerrufen
> > worden sein
> > Dieser Schlüssel könnte durch RSA mit Schlüssel 15B0FD82 [?]
> >  widerrufen
> > worden sein
> > pub  4096R/2B90D010  erzeugt: 2014-11-21  verfällt: 2022-11-19
> >  Aufruf: SC
> 
> Do you have the revoking keys in your keyring? It sounds as if there's a
> revocation sig attached to the public key but gpg has no way of
> determining its validity.
> 

No, I haven't. Yes, you're right, the encryption subkey had been revoked,
not the key, and I don't have the revokers' keys in my keyring. Thanks to
Peter's indications I could determine what it was all about.

Thanks.

Stebe



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list