GnuPG and the debian-archive-keyring
stebe at mailbox.org
stebe at mailbox.org
Mon Feb 1 00:06:54 CET 2016
Hi,
> Andrew Gallagher <andrewg at andrewg.com> hat am 31. Januar 2016 um 18:40
> geschrieben:
>
>
> On 31 Jan 2016, at 15:07, stebe at mailbox.org wrote:
> >
> > gpg2 --edit-key 0x2B90D010
> >
> > Dieser Schlüssel könnte durch RSA mit Schlüssel CA1CF964 [?]
> > widerrufen
> > worden sein
> > [This key may have been revoked by RSA key CA1CF964 [?]]
> > Dieser Schlüssel könnte durch RSA mit Schlüssel B12525C4 [?]
> > widerrufen
> > worden sein
> > Dieser Schlüssel könnte durch RSA mit Schlüssel 15B0FD82 [?]
> > widerrufen
> > worden sein
> > pub 4096R/2B90D010 erzeugt: 2014-11-21 verfällt: 2022-11-19
> > Aufruf: SC
>
> Do you have the revoking keys in your keyring? It sounds as if there's a
> revocation sig attached to the public key but gpg has no way of
> determining its validity.
>
No, I haven't. Yes, you're right, the encryption subkey had been revoked,
not the key, and I don't have the revokers' keys in my keyring. Thanks to
Peter's indications I could determine what it was all about.
Thanks.
Stebe
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list