Use of --passphrase-file
Harman, Michael
Michael.Harman at uhsinc.com
Fri Feb 19 15:05:15 CET 2016
Thanks Steve for your feedback! I spent a lot of time jotting down all the different ways to do this, including encrypting the passphrase file, adding some kind of trust to the key if possible or putting the passphrase inline in the code and then locking down the code itself. As you point out, any solution does not prevent someone from finding the passphrase if they really know how and where to look. I'll hide the passphrase and then lock it down with security.
Thanks again, Mike
Michael W. Harman, MIT | Senior Application Architect, Information Services | UHS of Delaware, Inc. | a subsidiary of Universal Health Services | Phone 610.768.3416
From: Steve Butler [mailto:sbutler at fchn.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:56 PM
To: Harman, Michael; gnupg-users at gnupg.org
Subject: RE: Use of --passphrase-file
Any "secure" storage for the passphrase will itself need a mechanism to "unlock". This only digs the hole one more level down. Only you can decide when to stop digging. But remember, whatever the automated script can do, a human following the script can also do. [Note to self, use "hacker" instead of "human" next time.]
After wrestling with this for some time several years ago, I came to the conclusion that I could only delay the inevitable and could not prevent it. I my case I chose to "hide" the plaintext passphrase in a fashion that kept the casual looker (non-hacker) at bay (1 level down) but was real easy to implement and didn't require another password/phrase. Any serious programmer could easily read the code and reveal the passphrase. Then I limit who has access to that particular box.
Stephen M. Butler, PMP, PSM
IT Manager - Software Engineering
First Choice Health Network
Email: sbutler at fchn.com<mailto:sbutler at fchn.com>
Voice: 206-268-2309
Fax: 206-268-6173
From: Gnupg-users [mailto:gnupg-users-bounces at gnupg.org] On Behalf Of Harman, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:34 AM
To: gnupg-users at gnupg.org<mailto:gnupg-users at gnupg.org>
Subject: Use of --passphrase-file
I am attempting to automate a process that decrypts files. The files are encrypted with my key which has a passphrase. I have determined I can use the "--passphrase-file" option to get the passphrase of my key. In the gpg documentation at https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manuals/gnupg/GPG-Esoteric-Options.html, under "--passphrase-file file" it says "Don't use this option if you can avoid it", but I can't find any alternative solution in the documentation. I found one blog that says to just remove the passphrase, however I'd like to preserve the passphrase. Do you have any recommendations where I can have a passphrase but still use it in an unattended fashion that is secure?
Michael W. Harman, MIT | Senior Application Architect, Information Services | UHS of Delaware, Inc. | a subsidiary of Universal Health Services | Phone 610.768.3416
UHS of Delaware, Inc. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be punishable by law. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
UHS of Delaware, Inc. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be punishable by law. If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20160219/03cf93a6/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list