GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



On Sunday 9 October 2016 at 11:53:10 PM, in
<mid:CACpWn9Q5seER_HY5rYKFaDeHxDmsLVP4aSySvNG3+HC1uvNGCw at mail.gmail.com>,
Schlacta, Christ wrote:-


> What we need is whomever maintains
> gpg4win to release a guide on how to have it utilize the system's
> install gnupg, so we can get 2.1.x working with some decent
> management interfacen.


Note: I use GnuPG 2.1.15 under Windows but do not use gpg4win.

That said, have you tried gpg4win's beta version?
Gpg4win version 3.0.0-beta187 (2016-09-05) includes GnuPG 2.1.15.
I'm not sure what component in the package is a beta; GnuPG 2.1.15
isn't and most of the version numbers match those in Gpg4win version
2.3.3 (2016-08-18).


- --
Best regards

MFPA                  <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net>

After all is said and done, a lot more will be said than done.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=
=CJP2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus