? Comments re key servers? re gpg-encrypted mail? re key servers carry many phony keys?
miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr
Tue Feb 7 00:01:52 CET 2017
( If viewed from the web, this email is a reply to this last January's
email of the same title:
I only (probably) need to close this issue, as a lot of the reasons for
failure to get some keys (not all) was the key not being uploaded, or
the lack of expertize on my part.
On 170131-01:20+0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
While most of it about GnuPG key over at:
The GPG key is missing from common keyservers #143
my issues also stem the prerequisites for securing my machine with
grsecurity, meaning it does take some true understanding of Linux
system to do it, else you can only fail...
Here's how I have, almost completely, finally configured the RBAC
policies for dirmngr, gpg-agent, gpgconf and gpg2:
GnuPG programs RBAC policies
Not so simple, is it, the above? Or are all readers here experts?
Maybe just if anybody can confirm whether another key is or is not
available from the common keyservers, as that is the only one that I
haven't managed to receive yet, this one:
(I re-tried just a few minutes ago, no luck.)
Such as in this message:
Which I have in my mailbox, as I am subscribed to mutt-users...
It's the key by the sender of, e.g. this message, but with another key:
RSA DF48830BABD37425 <-- This key I was able to --recv-key just fine...
( spare other address:
It's public mailing lists, I hope I'm not invading anybody's privacy by
And... I think I figured this out, as I'm writing this... That one is a
DSA key, that the cryptographer might not even have posted to
I'm CC'ing to David Champion too. Am I right, David?
Phew! Cryptography feels hard here too...
Thanks for bearing with me!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Gnupg-users